🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, protest has ceased to be a basic freedom. Rather, it has become a privilege that authorities grant or deny at their discretion. This constitutes the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the ruling administration is advancing, which would dictate when and where protests can occur, with potential prison sentences for those who defy these restrictions.

Erosion of Civil Liberties

Earlier governments had already undermined this fundamental freedom: the previous Tory administration had given law enforcement sweeping additional powers, which global rights bodies had censured as "significant and undue restrictions" on democratic freedoms. Collectively, these incremental attacks on freedom have effectively abolished the hard-won right to public demonstration.

Exploiting Atrocity to Rationalize Suppression

The most recent limitations are being defended by citing last week's heinous anti-Jewish attack on a British Islamic center. There should be widespread consensus that the safety of Jewish communities in Britain must be safeguarded. However, using this horrific incident as a justification to stifle dissent is not only disconnected to that responsibility but distorts it.

"When you can't draw the line at genocide, you likely cannot establish limits at democratic principles," observed a well-known American author, whose words that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Demonstration

Consider Britain's long tradition of public demonstration and direct action against racial discrimination and authoritarianism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to postwar Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s demonstrations against the National Front. Many of these early protesters were labeled as radicals in their era, even while they were fighting for the rights of marginalized groups.

Current Reality

In today's complicated landscape, here's what's truly happening: Israel – a foreign state – is committing acts that international bodies have characterized as genocide. Its warfare have prompted the International Criminal Court to release legal indictments against Israel's prime minister and his former defense minister.

International popular sentiment has shifted dramatically against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a substantial majority of citizens think Israel has likely committed international law violations. Most people would endorse a complete ban on arms sales to the state, and approve the detention of the Israeli leader.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially lost the public debate, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a despicable anti-Jewish attack to attempt to silence a popular campaign against a moral catastrophe. The British government seems included in this attempt. Ministers have not enacted comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have permitted arms exports to proceed.

People who are protesting against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a more extensive crackdown on these demonstrators until now: extremely few protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement minimal reason to intervene.

Problematic Association

Merging Jewish identity with the policies of the Israeli state is not only manipulative but also dangerous. The standard interpretation of anti-Jewish prejudice, adopted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been appropriately questioned for potentially restricting valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its central illustrations: that "holding Jewish people collectively responsible for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've arrived at a situation where law enforcement can propose that protests opposing Israel's policies should be called off because they might "accidentally or intentionally" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, government officials have stated that acknowledgment of Palestine as a nation has made political parties "complicit" in supposed mistreatment experienced by British Jews.

Double Standards

On the same day as the synagogue attack, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – increasing the horrific toll from two years of daily atrocities that have taken tens of thousands of lives. British politicians and news organizations have barely concealed the limited value they assign to Palestinian life. This represents one of the boldest expressions of racism in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already crossed a concerning boundary by banning Palestine Action, a non-violent, human rights-focused activist collective. Multiple thousands of British protesters have been arrested, primarily for carrying placards against mass killing and supporting the proscribed group. Many of those detained are pensioners; among them a retired priest and the daughter of a World War II genocide survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, government officials helped demonize pro-Palestinian protests: a ex-political leader implied that some were "connected to" foreign governments, while the current president described such protests as antisemitic. In doing so, they contributed to normalizing the repressive measures on such demonstrations – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be given sweeping powers to control dissent. What might a new administration do with this restrictive framework? Our forebears struggled, suffered and sacrificed their lives to secure our liberties. We may eventually regret how casually we allowed them to slip away.