🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents applauding your advice on expanding your business? Do recruiters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined an organized professional network test this week following viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors male users who use online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which content appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her reach decrease substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with similar "agentic" style

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Each day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some testers encountered favorable results. One writer who changed both her gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."